12 responses to “Eriophyllum lanatum var. lanatum”

  1. Knox M. Henry

    A very striking picture but there appears to be very little foliage. Is this a normal characteristic or are my eyes deceiving me?

  2. Lynn Wohlers

    Beautiful photo; nice to see habit and context. A Google image search illustrates the variety of types (I realize those image searches turn up all sorts of stuff; most of the images show foliage playing a minor role to the flowers’ star billing.

  3. Brent Hine

    Lovely image. Eriophyllum lanatum is my new favourite BC native plant. I found an individual growing on Elk mountain, south of Chilliwack, BC, during a hike last summer. The flowers are a soft, butter yellow, instead of the bright tint often seen.
    I also enjoyed a visit to S. Winchelsea Island a few years ago, to observe the native flora. It was a treat to see a (more or less) pristine Garry Oak ecosystem – the image makes me yearn to return!

  4. LPN

    I live in Lantzville and overlook the Winchelsea and Ada Island groups. This area is second to none for outdoor activity of all types. Although I see these Islands every day, I’ve never seen them up close like this. Thanks for posting.

  5. Ron B

    Often the foliage beneath is more apparent. I grew one here for years that never flowered. Looked like an artemisia, in that is was a silvery mat of dived leaves. Some Seattle rockeries have also had this in the past, perhaps grown alongside Arabis, Aubrieta, Aurinia or Iberis.

  6. crass

    What a great post. This is not only a “BC plant” but one that covers a vast area. I agree with you Ron B, the foliage can be gorgeous and is very pronounced through a lot of the year (and similar to sagebrush too). Some specimen really exemplify the “wooly” of the wooly sunflower. The foliage does tend to be overpowered by the bright flowers but when populations do flower it is beautiful. In the Great Basin, interior of the Cascades in Oregon, swaths of yellow can blanket the bare and dry scree fields and rocky sites. I think var. integrifolium?
    As a side, the plant in the foreground (right and below of E. lanatum) is also flowering and foliage is clearly visibile. It is a member of a really cool family, Crassulaceae, the Stone Crops. I believe it is Sedum spathulifolium which also covers a broad range from the coast to high in the West Cascades, at least in Oregon.

  7. Daniel Mosquin

    Crass, you’re right about the Sedum identification. Sheila’s friend took a photograph of it, and I think I’ll have it on here for Sunday.

  8. Mike Williams

    Great picture and fine perspective. This pic makes me more homesick than any beautiful picture of Vancouver or Stanley Park. Anyway back to the choking traffic jams of Bangkok. Keep up the good work, Mike.

  9. milarosa Librea

    I’m currently working on oil cell of Jatropha curcas.I need the expertise of Dr. Lersten to comment on my picture of the structure I took under the microscope. May I request for his email address? Thank you very much.
    Milarosa L. Librea
    Ateneo de Manila Unviversity

  10. Daniel Mosquin

    Hello Milarosa,
    If you’re not able to contact Dr. Lersten via the web page I’ve linked to, then I don’t know how.

  11. Alexander Jablanczy

    The word hybrid in this context is very ineresting. I should think that it would mean the crossing of two distinct species.
    But the way it’s used in this article is fairly different. Here hybrid is used to mean undifferentiated varieties combining which is not a hybrid is it? It’s all a matter of what is a species and if they aren’t already two distinct species then they are still varieties of the same species. Something like partial differentials. Reality or evolution just doesn’t follow taxonomic categories.
    So we need a new term for partial hybrids.
    Selfgrafted clonopseudohybrids?

  12. Nadia

    It is beautiful! Thank you!

Leave a Reply to crass Click here to cancel reply.